Monday, May 4, 2009

Final decisions on keynote & breakout sessions

Hello,

After reading Joe's comment about Horrell's scholarly lit on the topic leadership--and seeing the great bibliography of references that Joe just did-- am back to thinking that Hernon would be best as keynote. However, how about considering Horrell as a panelist (representing an academic library director pt of view?). So am revising my count here. Feel free to revise if you change your vote

Hernon (2)
Horrell (1)
Gordon (1)

Let's decide by May 8 on final choice. If we have clear pick earlier than that, we'll take next step to contact speaker choice asap.

Regarding the breakout themes, unless any of us have any further feedback, can we just go with the bullet points in Joe's final draft of mission. Let's really finalize this by May 8.

~
Brian

--------------

Some possible breakout topics:


  • The "Graying of the Profession": Are Academic Libraries Poised to Lose Their Most Valuable Resource?

  • Transfer of Power: Training the Next Generation of Library Leaders

  • Are the Nextgen's Prepared?: Issues in LIS Education

  • Will They Stay or Will They Go?: Recruitment and Retention of Nextgen Librarians

  • Bridging the Gap: Addressing Generational Issues in the Workplace

  • Redfining Librarianship in the 21st Century: Nextgen Librarians and Professional Identity

~Joe

7 comments:

Brian Lym said...

excellent topics Joe! I'd say we go with these. Unless we hear from others by end of week, let's stick to these.
~B

LACUNY Institute 2009 said...

I am not sure we need a discussion on The "Graying of the Profession": How will Upcoming Retirements Affect Academic Libraries? First, I think it's negative sterotyping to use 'graying'. Not sure how many retirements will be happening with pension and health care issues. I think we have enough breakout topics with the remaining five. Also baby boomers cover 1946-1964, a twenty year span and this group is very varied and not all are thinking of retirement because had kids later (now in college)and think they are forever young.

Sharon

LACUNY Institute 2009 said...

I think that in the current economic climate, there may not be so much retiring, and the other breakout issues are so much more positive that maybe we can skip this? Or maybe try to find a way to reframe the issue. The "Transfer of power" breakout will address some of this, and it's bound to come up in discussions and questions during the day.
Jane

LACUNY Institute 2009 said...

I agree that the topic should be rephrased. I think my point was to address whether the so-called "graying of the profession" was a real phenomenon (for all the reasons Jane and Sharon mention) and initiate a dialogue about what academic libraries would potentially be losing in terms of experience, institutional memory, etc.

~Joe

Brian Lym said...

I agree with the resphrase. Joe, can you pls. edit the breakout topic list in this post to reflect
~Brian

LACUNY Institute 2009 said...

Changed from:
The "Graying of the Profession": How Will Upcoming Retirements Affect Academic Libraries?

to:

The "Graying of the Profession": Are Academic Libraries Poised to Lose Their Most Valuable Resource?

If it's the "graying" that's being objected to I should add that it's simply the rubric used in the lit to describe trends in Census data, not my own words. The change in subtitle hopefully gives it a more positive connotation while at the same time leaving the issue more open-ended.

~Joe

Brian Lym said...

i like the change.
~brian

 
blog template by suckmylolly.com * background by Tayler